Immutable X vs Tokenbased
Immutable X vs Tokenbased, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Immutable X is on 66/100 and Tokenbased on 19/100.
Where each one leads
Immutable X
- our overall score: 66/100 against 19/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 26/100
Tokenbased
- domain rating: 88/100 against 74/100
- headcount: 7,303 against 213
- LinkedIn following: 387,693 against 56,539
At a glance
| Measure | Immutable X | Tokenbased |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A Layer 2 scaling solution for NFTs on Ethereum, offering gas-free minting and trading. | Transition your company from shareholder-centric structures to token-based economic networks. |
| Category | Web3, Blockchain, NFT, DeFi | Web3, Blockchain, Tokenization, Decentralized Autonomous Organization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Melbourne, Australia | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Immutable X | Tokenbased |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 213 | 7,303 |
| Total funding | $62.4M | Not published |
| Latest round | ICO | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 56,539 | 387,693 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Immutable X | Tokenbased |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 19/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | F (26/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Immutable X | Tokenbased |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Wix |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | PostHog | Not detected |
Immutable X vs Tokenbased: common questions
Which is better, Immutable X or Tokenbased?
On our 0-100 score Immutable X rates higher (66/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Immutable X and Tokenbased compare on the numbers?
Immutable X leads on our overall score (66/100 against 19/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 26/100). Tokenbased leads on domain rating (88/100 against 74/100), headcount (7,303 against 213), LinkedIn following (387,693 against 56,539).
Read the full Immutable X review and pricing or the Tokenbased review and pricing. You can also browse other Immutable X alternatives we track.