Immutable X vs Polygon
Immutable X vs Polygon, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Immutable X is on 66/100 and Polygon on 81/100.
Where each one leads
Immutable X
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 43/100
Polygon
- our overall score: 81/100 against 66/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 74/100
- headcount: 389 against 213
- funding raised: $400M against $62.4M
- LinkedIn following: 209,060 against 56,539
At a glance
| Measure | Immutable X | Polygon |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A Layer 2 scaling solution for NFTs on Ethereum, offering gas-free minting and trading. | A framework and platform for building and connecting blockchain networks, focusing on scalability and usability for Ethereum. |
| Category | Web3, Blockchain, NFT, DeFi | Blockchain, Web3, DeFi, Scalability |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Melbourne, Australia | Mumbai, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Immutable X | Polygon |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 213 | 389 |
| Total funding | $62.4M | $400M |
| Latest round | ICO | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.0B | $10B |
| LinkedIn followers | 56,539 | 209,060 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Immutable X | Polygon |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 81/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 5/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Immutable X | Polygon |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | PostHog | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Immutable X vs Polygon: common questions
Which is better, Immutable X or Polygon?
On our 0-100 score Polygon rates higher (81/100 against 66/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Immutable X and Polygon compare on the numbers?
Immutable X leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 43/100). Polygon leads on our overall score (81/100 against 66/100), domain rating (83/100 against 74/100), headcount (389 against 213), funding raised ($400M against $62.4M), LinkedIn following (209,060 against 56,539).
Read the full Immutable X review and pricing or the Polygon review and pricing. You can also browse other Immutable X alternatives we track.