Illusive Networks vs SafeBreach
Illusive Networks vs SafeBreach, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Illusive Networks is on 56/100 and SafeBreach on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Illusive Networks
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SafeBreach
- our overall score: 61/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 141 against 70
- headcount growth: +500.0% against -15.8%
- funding raised: $141M against $81.0M
- LinkedIn following: 23,010 against 10,813
At a glance
| Measure | Illusive Networks | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Illusive Networks provides deception-based cybersecurity solutions to detect and stop advanced attacks by creating a deceptive layer across the network. | SafeBreach offers a continuous security validation platform that simulates breach and attack scenarios to identify security gaps. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Autonomous, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Breach and Attack Simulation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Illusive Networks | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 70 | 141 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -15.8% | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $81.0M | $141M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D Extension |
| Valuation | $96.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,813 | 23,010 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Illusive Networks | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Illusive Networks | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Illusive Networks | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Has anyone used Illusive networks products?. Trying to figure out if it's all smoke and mirrors, or if it is actually useful.”r/sysadmin
Illusive Networks vs SafeBreach: common questions
Which is better, Illusive Networks or SafeBreach?
On our 0-100 score SafeBreach rates higher (61/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Illusive Networks and SafeBreach compare on the numbers?
SafeBreach leads on our overall score (61/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 21/100), domain rating (71/100 against 56/100), headcount (141 against 70), headcount growth (+500.0% against -15.8%), funding raised ($141M against $81.0M), LinkedIn following (23,010 against 10,813).
What do real users say about Illusive Networks and SafeBreach?
Illusive Networks: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/sysadmin.
Read the full Illusive Networks review and pricing or the SafeBreach review and pricing. You can also browse other Illusive Networks alternatives we track.