IHS Markit vs Intercontinental Exchange
IHS Markit vs Intercontinental Exchange, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IHS Markit is on 29/100 and Intercontinental Exchange on 39/100.
Where each one leads
IHS Markit
- funding raised: $1.2B against $50.0M
Intercontinental Exchange
- our overall score: 39/100 against 29/100
- agent readiness: 31/100 against 24/100
At a glance
| Measure | IHS Markit | Intercontinental Exchange |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in critical information, analytics, and solutions for major industries and markets. | Global operator of exchanges, clearing houses, and data services for financial and commodity markets. |
| Category | Information Services, Data Analytics, Financial Services, Transportation | Financial Services, Financial Markets, Exchanges, Data Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform | services | software |
| Founded | 1959 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Atlanta, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IHS Markit | Intercontinental Exchange |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 11,547 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +0.8% |
| Total funding | $1.2B | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Grant (prize money) | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 289,021 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IHS Markit | Intercontinental Exchange |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 29/100 | 39/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 10/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 25/100 | 30/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (24/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IHS Markit | Intercontinental Exchange |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
IHS Markit vs Intercontinental Exchange: common questions
Which is better, IHS Markit or Intercontinental Exchange?
On our 0-100 score Intercontinental Exchange rates higher (39/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IHS Markit and Intercontinental Exchange compare on the numbers?
IHS Markit leads on funding raised ($1.2B against $50.0M). Intercontinental Exchange leads on our overall score (39/100 against 29/100), agent readiness (31/100 against 24/100).
Read the full IHS Markit review and pricing or the Intercontinental Exchange review and pricing. You can also browse other IHS Markit alternatives we track.