Findings vs Tufin
Findings vs Tufin, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Findings is on 59/100 and Tufin on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Findings
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 40/100
Tufin
- our overall score: 63/100 against 59/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 506 against 37
- funding raised: $8.0M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 52,901 against 3,549
At a glance
| Measure | Findings | Tufin |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automates enterprise vendor risk assessment and supply chain security and ESG processes. | Tufin provides a security policy management platform that automates and analyzes network security for large, complex enterprise networks. |
| Category | Enterprise, Vendor Management, Supply Chain, Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Compliance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Findings | Tufin |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 37 | 506 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +12.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $5.0M | $8.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,549 | 52,901 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Findings | Tufin |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Findings | Tufin |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Findings vs Tufin: common questions
Which is better, Findings or Tufin?
On our 0-100 score Tufin rates higher (63/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Findings and Tufin compare on the numbers?
Findings leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 40/100). Tufin leads on our overall score (63/100 against 59/100), domain rating (72/100 against 34/100), headcount (506 against 37), funding raised ($8.0M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (52,901 against 3,549).
Read the full Findings review and pricing or the Tufin review and pricing. You can also browse other Findings alternatives we track.