Findings vs Pecan
Findings vs Pecan, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Findings is on 59/100 and Pecan on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Findings
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Pecan
- our overall score: 64/100 against 59/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 90 against 37
- funding raised: $116M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 13,773 against 3,549
At a glance
| Measure | Findings | Pecan |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automates enterprise vendor risk assessment and supply chain security and ESG processes. | Automated AI predictive analytics platform for businesses to build and deploy models. |
| Category | Enterprise, Vendor Management, Supply Chain, Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) | Enterprise, Customer Engagement, User Acquisition, Supply Chain |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Findings | Pecan |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 37 | 90 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +12.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $5.0M | $116M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,549 | 13,773 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Findings | Pecan |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Findings | Pecan |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, PostHog, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Findings vs Pecan: common questions
Which is better, Findings or Pecan?
On our 0-100 score Pecan rates higher (64/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Findings and Pecan compare on the numbers?
Pecan leads on our overall score (64/100 against 59/100), domain rating (69/100 against 34/100), headcount (90 against 37), funding raised ($116M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (13,773 against 3,549).
Read the full Findings review and pricing or the Pecan review and pricing. You can also browse other Findings alternatives we track.