iCoreConnect vs Phreesia
iCoreConnect vs Phreesia, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: iCoreConnect is on Not scored yet and Phreesia on 61/100.
Where each one leads
iCoreConnect
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Phreesia
- domain rating: 71/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 1,532 against 103
- LinkedIn following: 68,147 against 12,784
At a glance
| Measure | iCoreConnect | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Healthcare software simplifying operations and improving patient experiences for dental and medical practices. | A healthcare software platform automating patient check-in, scheduling, payments, and administrative tasks. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Vertical SaaS, Practice Management Software | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Patient Engagement, Healthcare Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2001 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Orlando, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | iCoreConnect | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 103 | 1,532 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +167.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $120M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,784 | 68,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | iCoreConnect | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | Not published | 61/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 28/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | iCoreConnect | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Framer | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
iCoreConnect vs Phreesia: common questions
Which is better, iCoreConnect or Phreesia?
On our 0-100 score Phreesia rates higher (61/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do iCoreConnect and Phreesia compare on the numbers?
Phreesia leads on domain rating (71/100 against 46/100), headcount (1,532 against 103), LinkedIn following (68,147 against 12,784).
Read the full iCoreConnect review and pricing or the Phreesia review and pricing. You can also browse other iCoreConnect alternatives we track.