ICF vs Jacobs
ICF vs Jacobs, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ICF is on 35/100 and Jacobs on 75/100.
Where each one leads
ICF
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Jacobs
- our overall score: 75/100 against 35/100
- headcount: 68,168 against 10,679
At a glance
| Measure | ICF | Jacobs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global consulting and technology services firm focused on climate, public health, and federal modernization. | Global technical professional services firm providing engineering, consulting, and technology solutions. |
| Category | Environment, Transportation, Education, Government Services | Engineering, Consulting, Infrastructure, Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 1969 | 1947 |
| Headquarters | Reston, United States | Dallas, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ICF | Jacobs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 10,679 | 68,168 |
| LinkedIn followers | 267,761 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ICF | Jacobs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 75/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 11/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ICF | Jacobs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
ICF vs Jacobs: common questions
Which is better, ICF or Jacobs?
On our 0-100 score Jacobs rates higher (75/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ICF and Jacobs compare on the numbers?
Jacobs leads on our overall score (75/100 against 35/100), headcount (68,168 against 10,679).
Read the full ICF review and pricing or the Jacobs review and pricing. You can also browse other ICF alternatives we track.