ICF vs IHS Markit
ICF vs IHS Markit, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ICF is on 35/100 and IHS Markit on 29/100.
Where each one leads
ICF
- our overall score: 35/100 against 29/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 24/100
IHS Markit
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | ICF | IHS Markit |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global consulting and technology services firm focused on climate, public health, and federal modernization. | Global leader in critical information, analytics, and solutions for major industries and markets. |
| Category | Environment, Transportation, Education, Government Services | Information Services, Data Analytics, Financial Services, Transportation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 1969 | 1959 |
| Headquarters | Reston, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ICF | IHS Markit |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 10,679 | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.2B |
| Latest round | Not published | Grant (prize money) |
| LinkedIn followers | 267,761 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ICF | IHS Markit |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 25/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (24/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ICF | IHS Markit |
|---|---|---|
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
ICF vs IHS Markit: common questions
Which is better, ICF or IHS Markit?
On our 0-100 score ICF rates higher (35/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ICF and IHS Markit compare on the numbers?
ICF leads on our overall score (35/100 against 29/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 24/100).
Read the full ICF review and pricing or the IHS Markit review and pricing. You can also browse other ICF alternatives we track.