Iceberg Quantum vs QEDMA
Iceberg Quantum vs QEDMA, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Iceberg Quantum is on 52/100 and QEDMA on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Iceberg Quantum
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
QEDMA
- our overall score: 56/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 52/100 against 23/100
- funding raised: $40.7M against $8.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Iceberg Quantum | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Designs advanced quantum computing architectures using LDPC codes for fault-tolerant systems. | Israeli startup developing quantum noise resilience software to improve quantum computing. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, LDPC Codes, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Software, Operating System |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2024 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Cambridge, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Iceberg Quantum | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +31.2% |
| Open roles | Not published | 4 |
| Total funding | $8.0M | $40.7M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 5,017 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Iceberg Quantum | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 54/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 30/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 23/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Iceberg Quantum | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Iceberg Quantum vs QEDMA: common questions
Which is better, Iceberg Quantum or QEDMA?
On our 0-100 score QEDMA rates higher (56/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Iceberg Quantum and QEDMA compare on the numbers?
QEDMA leads on our overall score (56/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 36/100), domain rating (52/100 against 23/100), funding raised ($40.7M against $8.0M).
Read the full Iceberg Quantum review and pricing or the QEDMA review and pricing. You can also browse other Iceberg Quantum alternatives we track.