Icarus vs Uma
Icarus vs Uma, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Icarus is on 54/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Icarus
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Uma
- our overall score: 58/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 36/100 against 17/100
- funding raised: $40.0M against $6.1M
At a glance
| Measure | Icarus | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing a robotic labor force for space operations, starting with the ISS. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, SpaceTech, AI, Embodied AI | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | Hardware |
| Founded | 2024 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Brooklyn, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Icarus | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 29 |
| Total funding | $6.1M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Icarus | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 11/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 42/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 17/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Icarus | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Icarus vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, Icarus or Uma?
On our 0-100 score Uma rates higher (58/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Icarus and Uma compare on the numbers?
Uma leads on our overall score (58/100 against 54/100), domain rating (36/100 against 17/100), funding raised ($40.0M against $6.1M).
Read the full Icarus review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other Icarus alternatives we track.