iCAD vs Qure.ai
iCAD vs Qure.ai, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: iCAD is on 55/100 and Qure.ai on 58/100.
Where each one leads
iCAD
- headcount: 353 against 2
Qure.ai
- our overall score: 58/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 63/100 against 53/100
- funding raised: $144M against $37.5M
At a glance
| Measure | iCAD | Qure.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered cancer detection and therapy solutions for early diagnosis and personalized risk assessment. | AI-powered medical imaging analysis for faster diagnosis and treatment in healthcare. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Clinical Trials | HealthTech, MedTech, AI-Driven Drug Discovery, Clinical Trials |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1984 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Nashua, United States | Mumbai, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | iCAD | Qure.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 353 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +26.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $37.5M | $144M |
| Latest round | Direct Offering | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 15,268 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | iCAD | Qure.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 5/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | iCAD | Qure.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Linkedin Insight |
| Open source | No | Yes |
iCAD vs Qure.ai: common questions
Which is better, iCAD or Qure.ai?
On our 0-100 score Qure.ai rates higher (58/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do iCAD and Qure.ai compare on the numbers?
iCAD leads on headcount (353 against 2). Qure.ai leads on our overall score (58/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 39/100), domain rating (63/100 against 53/100), funding raised ($144M against $37.5M).
Read the full iCAD review and pricing or the Qure.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other iCAD alternatives we track.