IBM vs OpenText
IBM vs OpenText, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IBM is on 61/100 and OpenText on 9/100.
Where each one leads
IBM
- our overall score: 61/100 against 9/100
OpenText
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 31/100
At a glance
| Measure | IBM | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global technology leader providing AI, cloud, software, and consulting services for businesses. | Enterprise information management software and services provider. |
| Category | Software, Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Software | Enterprise Software, Information Management, Content Management, Business Process Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 1911 | 1991 |
| Headquarters | Armonk, United States | Waterloo, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IBM | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 324,517 | Not published |
| Total funding | $153M | Not published |
| Latest round | Follow-on | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IBM | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 9/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 20/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 49/100 | 5/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IBM | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | IBM | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 5 negative across 6 threads |
“OpenText is the worst company I’ve worked at. I joined during COVID right after finishing my Master’s from a top university. Role: Software Developer. I worked hard, got consistently good performance reviews, and delivered solid work. But e”r/waterloo
IBM vs OpenText: common questions
Which is better, IBM or OpenText?
On our 0-100 score IBM rates higher (61/100 against 9/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IBM and OpenText compare on the numbers?
IBM leads on our overall score (61/100 against 9/100). OpenText leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 31/100).
What do real users say about IBM and OpenText?
OpenText: 0 positive and 5 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/waterloo.
Read the full IBM review and pricing or the OpenText review and pricing. You can also browse other IBM alternatives we track.