IBM vs NinjaOne
IBM vs NinjaOne, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IBM is on 61/100 and NinjaOne on 59/100.
Where each one leads
IBM
- domain rating: 92/100 against 78/100
- headcount: 324,517 against 300
NinjaOne
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 31/100
- funding raised: $1.2B against $153M
At a glance
| Measure | IBM | NinjaOne |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global technology leader providing AI, cloud, software, and consulting services for businesses. | Unified endpoint management platform that helps IT teams automate, manage, and secure their IT infrastructure. |
| Category | Software, Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Software | Software, Cybersecurity, IT Management, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1911 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Armonk, United States | Austin, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IBM | NinjaOne |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 324,517 | 300 |
| Total funding | $153M | $1.2B |
| Latest round | Follow-on | Secondary |
| Valuation | Not published | $12B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IBM | NinjaOne |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 20/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 49/100 | 16/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IBM | NinjaOne |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel +1 more |
| Open source | No | Yes |
IBM vs NinjaOne: common questions
Which is better, IBM or NinjaOne?
On our 0-100 score IBM rates higher (61/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IBM and NinjaOne compare on the numbers?
IBM leads on domain rating (92/100 against 78/100), headcount (324,517 against 300). NinjaOne leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 31/100), funding raised ($1.2B against $153M).
Read the full IBM review and pricing or the NinjaOne review and pricing. You can also browse other IBM alternatives we track.