IBM vs MuleSoft
IBM vs MuleSoft, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IBM is on 61/100 and MuleSoft on 59/100.
Where each one leads
IBM
- agent readiness: 31/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 82/100
- headcount: 324,517 against 1,142
MuleSoft
- funding raised: $259M against $153M
At a glance
| Measure | IBM | MuleSoft |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global technology leader providing AI, cloud, software, and consulting services for businesses. | Anypoint Platform for API-led connectivity and integration. |
| Category | Software, Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Software | API Platform, Integration Platform, Enterprise Software, Cloud Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1911 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Armonk, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IBM | MuleSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 324,517 | 1,142 |
| Total funding | $153M | $259M |
| Latest round | Follow-on | Series G |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 292,486 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IBM | MuleSoft |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 40/100 |
| Community | 20/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 49/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IBM | MuleSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | AWS |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
IBM vs MuleSoft: common questions
Which is better, IBM or MuleSoft?
On our 0-100 score IBM rates higher (61/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IBM and MuleSoft compare on the numbers?
IBM leads on agent readiness (31/100 against 25/100), domain rating (92/100 against 82/100), headcount (324,517 against 1,142). MuleSoft leads on funding raised ($259M against $153M).
Read the full IBM review and pricing or the MuleSoft review and pricing. You can also browse other IBM alternatives we track.