i-BrainTech vs NeuroPace
i-BrainTech vs NeuroPace, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: i-BrainTech is on 20/100 and NeuroPace on 67/100.
Where each one leads
i-BrainTech
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
NeuroPace
- our overall score: 67/100 against 20/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 52/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 248 against 18
- LinkedIn following: 32,261 against 3,558
At a glance
| Measure | i-BrainTech | NeuroPace |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered neurointerface for motor function restoration and improvement through gamified rehabilitation. | Develops a brain-computer interface for treating epilepsy. |
| Category | Sports, Neuroscience, EEG, Therapy | MedTech, HealthTech, Brain-Computer Interface, Non-Invasive BCI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | Hardware |
| Founded | 2019 | 1997 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Mountain View, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | i-BrainTech | NeuroPace |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 248 |
| Total funding | Not published | $475M |
| Latest round | Not published | IPO |
| Valuation | Not published | $375M |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,558 | 32,261 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | i-BrainTech | NeuroPace |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 20/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 13/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 33/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | i-BrainTech | NeuroPace |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
i-BrainTech vs NeuroPace: common questions
Which is better, i-BrainTech or NeuroPace?
On our 0-100 score NeuroPace rates higher (67/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do i-BrainTech and NeuroPace compare on the numbers?
NeuroPace leads on our overall score (67/100 against 20/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 39/100), domain rating (52/100 against 33/100), headcount (248 against 18), LinkedIn following (32,261 against 3,558).
Read the full i-BrainTech review and pricing or the NeuroPace review and pricing. You can also browse other i-BrainTech alternatives we track.