Hyland vs M-Files Content Collaboration
Hyland vs M-Files Content Collaboration, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hyland is on 47/100 and M-Files Content Collaboration on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Hyland
- headcount: 4,192 against 839
- funding raised: $3.4B against $201M
- LinkedIn following: 131,847 against 47,811
M-Files Content Collaboration
- our overall score: 56/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 39/100
At a glance
| Measure | Hyland | M-Files Content Collaboration |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hyland provides enterprise content services and management solutions for organizations worldwide. | Intelligent content management and automation platform for enterprise information. |
| Category | Enterprise Software, Document Management, Content Services Platform, Business Process Management | Enterprise Software, Information Management, Content Management, Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software |
| Founded | 1991 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Westlake, United States | Plano, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hyland | M-Files Content Collaboration |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4,192 | 839 |
| Total funding | $3.4B | $201M |
| Latest round | Conventional Debt | Growth Equity |
| LinkedIn followers | 131,847 | 47,811 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hyland | M-Files Content Collaboration |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hyland | M-Files Content Collaboration |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Sveltekit, Svelte | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Hyland vs M-Files Content Collaboration: common questions
Which is better, Hyland or M-Files Content Collaboration?
On our 0-100 score M-Files Content Collaboration rates higher (56/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hyland and M-Files Content Collaboration compare on the numbers?
Hyland leads on headcount (4,192 against 839), funding raised ($3.4B against $201M), LinkedIn following (131,847 against 47,811). M-Files Content Collaboration leads on our overall score (56/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 39/100).
Read the full Hyland review and pricing or the M-Files Content Collaboration review and pricing. You can also browse other Hyland alternatives we track.