Huntress vs Rotate
Huntress vs Rotate, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Huntress is on 68/100 and Rotate on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Huntress
- our overall score: 68/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 892 against 17
- LinkedIn following: 131,362 against 9,535
Rotate
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 77/100
At a glance
| Measure | Huntress | Rotate |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Huntress provides a managed security platform that helps organizations detect and respond to threats. | 360° cybersecurity platform integrating security and insurance for business safety and continuity. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Managed Detection and Response (MDR), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), Supply Chain Security | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, InsurTech, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Columbia, USA | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Huntress | Rotate |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 892 | 17 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +26.3% |
| Total funding | $268M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 131,362 | 9,535 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Huntress | Rotate |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 13/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 45/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Huntress | Rotate |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Drift |
Huntress vs Rotate: common questions
Which is better, Huntress or Rotate?
On our 0-100 score Huntress rates higher (68/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Huntress and Rotate compare on the numbers?
Huntress leads on our overall score (68/100 against 46/100), headcount (892 against 17), LinkedIn following (131,362 against 9,535). Rotate leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 48/100), domain rating (90/100 against 77/100).
Read the full Huntress review and pricing or the Rotate review and pricing. You can also browse other Huntress alternatives we track.