Hunters vs Torq
Hunters vs Torq, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hunters is on 60/100 and Torq on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Hunters
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Torq
- our overall score: 65/100 against 60/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 352 against 187
- funding raised: $190M against $103M
- LinkedIn following: 41,530 against 25,498
At a glance
| Measure | Hunters | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for threat detection, investigation, and response in cybersecurity. | Hyperautomation platform unifying and automating security infrastructure for enhanced protection and productivity. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response (XDR), Threat Detection, Endpoint Security | Enterprise, Development, Cybersecurity, Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hunters | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 187 | 352 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +40.8% |
| Total funding | $103M | $190M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,498 | 41,530 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hunters | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 47/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hunters | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Hunters | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“Anyone have experience working at Torq?. I’m currently interviewing at Torq and while the product and client reviews look good, Repvue shows average quota attainment at 19%.”r/techsales
Hunters vs Torq: common questions
Which is better, Hunters or Torq?
On our 0-100 score Torq rates higher (65/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hunters and Torq compare on the numbers?
Torq leads on our overall score (65/100 against 60/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 40/100), domain rating (70/100 against 61/100), headcount (352 against 187), funding raised ($190M against $103M), LinkedIn following (41,530 against 25,498).
What do real users say about Hunters and Torq?
Torq: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/techsales.
Read the full Hunters review and pricing or the Torq review and pricing. You can also browse other Hunters alternatives we track.