Hunters vs Tines
Hunters vs Tines, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hunters is on 60/100 and Tines on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Hunters
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Tines
- our overall score: 66/100 against 60/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 563 against 187
- funding raised: $260M against $103M
- LinkedIn following: 60,286 against 25,498
At a glance
| Measure | Hunters | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for threat detection, investigation, and response in cybersecurity. | No-code automation platform for security and IT teams to streamline workflows and enhance productivity. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response (XDR), Threat Detection, Endpoint Security | Security Automation, Workflow Automation, No-Code Platform, IT Operations |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Dublin, Ireland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hunters | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 187 | 563 |
| Total funding | $103M | $260M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,498 | 60,286 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hunters | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hunters | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Hunters vs Tines: common questions
Which is better, Hunters or Tines?
On our 0-100 score Tines rates higher (66/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hunters and Tines compare on the numbers?
Tines leads on our overall score (66/100 against 60/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 40/100), domain rating (73/100 against 61/100), headcount (563 against 187), funding raised ($260M against $103M), LinkedIn following (60,286 against 25,498).
Read the full Hunters review and pricing or the Tines review and pricing. You can also browse other Hunters alternatives we track.