Hunters vs Logpoint
Hunters vs Logpoint, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hunters is on 60/100 and Logpoint on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Hunters
- our overall score: 60/100 against 48/100
Logpoint
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 40/100
- LinkedIn following: 31,946 against 25,498
At a glance
| Measure | Hunters | Logpoint |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for threat detection, investigation, and response in cybersecurity. | AI-powered cybersecurity platform for threat detection, investigation, and response. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response (XDR), Threat Detection, Endpoint Security | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Security Orchestration, Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hunters | Logpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 187 | 157 |
| Total funding | $103M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,498 | 31,946 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hunters | Logpoint |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 20/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hunters | Logpoint |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Hunters vs Logpoint: common questions
Which is better, Hunters or Logpoint?
On our 0-100 score Hunters rates higher (60/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hunters and Logpoint compare on the numbers?
Hunters leads on our overall score (60/100 against 48/100). Logpoint leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 40/100), LinkedIn following (31,946 against 25,498).
Read the full Hunters review and pricing or the Logpoint review and pricing. You can also browse other Hunters alternatives we track.