Hunters AI vs Torq
Hunters AI vs Torq, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hunters AI is on 70/100 and Torq on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Hunters AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 65/100
Torq
- domain rating: 70/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 352 against 180
- funding raised: $190M against $118M
- LinkedIn following: 41,530 against 25,421
At a glance
| Measure | Hunters AI | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. | Hyperautomation platform unifying and automating security infrastructure for enhanced protection and productivity. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Development, Cybersecurity, Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hunters AI | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 180 | 352 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +40.8% |
| Total funding | $118M | $190M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,421 | 41,530 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hunters AI | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 56/100 | 47/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hunters AI | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Hunters AI | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“Anyone have experience working at Torq?. I’m currently interviewing at Torq and while the product and client reviews look good, Repvue shows average quota attainment at 19%.”r/techsales
Hunters AI vs Torq: common questions
Which is better, Hunters AI or Torq?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 65/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hunters AI and Torq compare on the numbers?
Hunters AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 65/100). Torq leads on domain rating (70/100 against 61/100), headcount (352 against 180), funding raised ($190M against $118M), LinkedIn following (41,530 against 25,421).
What do real users say about Hunters AI and Torq?
Torq: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/techsales.
Read the full Hunters AI review and pricing or the Torq review and pricing. You can also browse other Hunters AI alternatives we track.