Hunters AI vs Tines
Hunters AI vs Tines, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hunters AI is on 70/100 and Tines on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Hunters AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 66/100
Tines
- domain rating: 73/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 563 against 180
- funding raised: $260M against $118M
- LinkedIn following: 60,286 against 25,421
At a glance
| Measure | Hunters AI | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. | No-code automation platform for security and IT teams to streamline workflows and enhance productivity. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection | Security Automation, Workflow Automation, No-Code Platform, IT Operations |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Dublin, Ireland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hunters AI | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 180 | 563 |
| Total funding | $118M | $260M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,421 | 60,286 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hunters AI | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 56/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hunters AI | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Hunters AI vs Tines: common questions
Which is better, Hunters AI or Tines?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 66/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hunters AI and Tines compare on the numbers?
Hunters AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 66/100). Tines leads on domain rating (73/100 against 61/100), headcount (563 against 180), funding raised ($260M against $118M), LinkedIn following (60,286 against 25,421).
Read the full Hunters AI review and pricing or the Tines review and pricing. You can also browse other Hunters AI alternatives we track.