Hunters AI vs Sweet Security
Hunters AI vs Sweet Security, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hunters AI is on 70/100 and Sweet Security on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Hunters AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 180 against 119
- LinkedIn following: 25,421 against 8,963
Sweet Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Hunters AI | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. | Cloud runtime security suite defending cloud workloads with offensive and defensive expertise. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, AppSec |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hunters AI | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 180 | 119 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +126.9% |
| Total funding | $118M | $128M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,421 | 8,963 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hunters AI | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 56/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hunters AI | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Hunters AI vs Sweet Security: common questions
Which is better, Hunters AI or Sweet Security?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hunters AI and Sweet Security compare on the numbers?
Hunters AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 39/100), domain rating (61/100 against 47/100), headcount (180 against 119), LinkedIn following (25,421 against 8,963).
Read the full Hunters AI review and pricing or the Sweet Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Hunters AI alternatives we track.