Hunters AI vs Quilr
Hunters AI vs Quilr, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hunters AI is on 70/100 and Quilr on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Hunters AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 180 against 70
- funding raised: $118M against $4.0M
- LinkedIn following: 25,421 against 6,661
Quilr
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Hunters AI | Quilr |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. | Quilr uses AI agents and a Service-as-Software platform to prevent human-related security breaches. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection | Agentic AI, Cybersecurity, AI Agent, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hunters AI | Quilr |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 180 | 70 |
| Total funding | $118M | $4.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,421 | 6,661 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hunters AI | Quilr |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 56/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hunters AI | Quilr |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Hunters AI | Quilr |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Safe AI Adoption, Frictionless Data Sharing, SaaS Identity Protection, Behavioral Risk Management, Self-Resolution of Alerts |
Hunters AI vs Quilr: common questions
Which is better, Hunters AI or Quilr?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hunters AI and Quilr compare on the numbers?
Hunters AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 51/100), domain rating (61/100 against 31/100), headcount (180 against 70), funding raised ($118M against $4.0M), LinkedIn following (25,421 against 6,661).
Read the full Hunters AI review and pricing or the Quilr review and pricing. You can also browse other Hunters AI alternatives we track.