Hunters AI vs Phish.ai
Hunters AI vs Phish.ai, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hunters AI is on 70/100 and Phish.ai on 19/100.
Where each one leads
Hunters AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 19/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 8/100
- headcount: 180 against 2
Phish.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Hunters AI | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. | Real-time, zero-day phishing prevention using cloud-native AI and computer vision. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hunters AI | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 180 | 2 |
| Total funding | $118M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,421 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hunters AI | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 19/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 56/100 | 5/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 8/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hunters AI | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Hunters AI | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“Harnessing the power of Phish.AI, PhishTank, Google Big Query and Google Data Studio to analyze Phishing Trends.”r/bigquery
Hunters AI vs Phish.ai: common questions
Which is better, Hunters AI or Phish.ai?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hunters AI and Phish.ai compare on the numbers?
Hunters AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 19/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 42/100), domain rating (61/100 against 8/100), headcount (180 against 2).
What do real users say about Hunters AI and Phish.ai?
Phish.ai: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/bigquery.
Read the full Hunters AI review and pricing or the Phish.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Hunters AI alternatives we track.