Hunters AI vs IntSights
Hunters AI vs IntSights, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hunters AI is on 70/100 and IntSights on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Hunters AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 180 against 19
- funding raised: $118M against $71.3M
- LinkedIn following: 25,421 against 11,634
IntSights
- domain rating: 83/100 against 61/100
At a glance
| Measure | Hunters AI | IntSights |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. | Cyber threat intelligence platform detecting and analyzing threats across the open, deep, and dark web. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cyber Intelligence, Dark Web |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hunters AI | IntSights |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 180 | 19 |
| Total funding | $118M | $71.3M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,421 | 11,634 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hunters AI | IntSights |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 56/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hunters AI | IntSights |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Hunters AI vs IntSights: common questions
Which is better, Hunters AI or IntSights?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hunters AI and IntSights compare on the numbers?
Hunters AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 62/100), headcount (180 against 19), funding raised ($118M against $71.3M), LinkedIn following (25,421 against 11,634). IntSights leads on domain rating (83/100 against 61/100).
Read the full Hunters AI review and pricing or the IntSights review and pricing. You can also browse other Hunters AI alternatives we track.