Hunter vs Xverum
Hunter vs Xverum, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hunter is on 62/100 and Xverum on 20/100.
Where each one leads
Hunter
- our overall score: 62/100 against 20/100
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 82/100 against 10/100
- LinkedIn following: 12,262 against 1,127
Xverum
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Hunter | Xverum |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hunter.io is an all-in-one email outreach platform that helps sales, marketing, and recruiting teams find and verify professional email addresses and automate cold email campaigns. | Provides precision-built, current, and complete datasets for B2B SaaS and AI/ML companies. |
| Category | Sales Technology, Marketing Technology, Data Enrichment, Lead Generation | Data Platform, B2B SaaS, AI Infrastructure, Machine Learning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hunter | Xverum |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 36 | 42 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -49.5% |
| Total funding | $63.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,262 | 1,127 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hunter | Xverum |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 16/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (61/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 10/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hunter | Xverum |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Hunter | Xverum |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Precision-Built Datasets, Near-100% Market Coverage, Rapid Data Refresh Rates, Built-in Compliance, Effortless API Integration, Custom Data Enrichment |
Hunter vs Xverum: common questions
Which is better, Hunter or Xverum?
On our 0-100 score Hunter rates higher (62/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hunter and Xverum compare on the numbers?
Hunter leads on our overall score (62/100 against 20/100), agent readiness (61/100 against 49/100), domain rating (82/100 against 10/100), LinkedIn following (12,262 against 1,127).
Read the full Hunter review and pricing or the Xverum review and pricing. You can also browse other Hunter alternatives we track.