Hunter vs Lusha
Hunter vs Lusha, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hunter is on 62/100 and Lusha on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Hunter
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 47/100
Lusha
- our overall score: 70/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 358 against 36
- funding raised: $245M against $63.0M
- LinkedIn following: 66,037 against 12,262
At a glance
| Measure | Hunter | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hunter.io is an all-in-one email outreach platform that helps sales, marketing, and recruiting teams find and verify professional email addresses and automate cold email campaigns. | B2B contact data platform for sales and marketing professionals to find and engage leads. |
| Category | Sales Technology, Marketing Technology, Data Enrichment, Lead Generation | Enterprise, Sales, Intelligence, Contact Data Provider |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hunter | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 36 | 358 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +3.7% |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $245M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,262 | 66,037 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hunter | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 52/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (61/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hunter | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
Hunter vs Lusha: common questions
Which is better, Hunter or Lusha?
On our 0-100 score Lusha rates higher (70/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hunter and Lusha compare on the numbers?
Hunter leads on agent readiness (61/100 against 47/100). Lusha leads on our overall score (70/100 against 62/100), headcount (358 against 36), funding raised ($245M against $63.0M), LinkedIn following (66,037 against 12,262).
Read the full Hunter review and pricing or the Lusha review and pricing. You can also browse other Hunter alternatives we track.