Hughes Communications vs Skylo
Hughes Communications vs Skylo, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hughes Communications is on Not scored yet and Skylo on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Hughes Communications
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 3,225 against 168
- LinkedIn following: 69,200 against 42,395
Skylo
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Hughes Communications | Skylo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hughes Communications was a provider of satellite-based communication services, now a subsidiary of EchoStar. | Satellite IoT connectivity for businesses and governments worldwide. |
| Category | Satellite Communications, Telecommunications, Internet Service Provider, Managed Network Services | Satellite, IoT, Connectivity, Telecommunications |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | Platform |
| Founded | 1971 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Germantown, United States | Redwood City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hughes Communications | Skylo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,225 | 168 |
| Total funding | Not published | $190M |
| LinkedIn followers | 69,200 | 42,395 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hughes Communications | Skylo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | Not published | 57/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 27/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hughes Communications | Skylo |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Hughes Communications vs Skylo: common questions
Which is better, Hughes Communications or Skylo?
On our 0-100 score Skylo rates higher (57/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hughes Communications and Skylo compare on the numbers?
Hughes Communications leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 36/100), domain rating (72/100 against 58/100), headcount (3,225 against 168), LinkedIn following (69,200 against 42,395).
Read the full Hughes Communications review and pricing or the Skylo review and pricing. You can also browse other Hughes Communications alternatives we track.