Hughes Communications vs PARATUS group
Hughes Communications vs PARATUS group, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hughes Communications is on Not scored yet and PARATUS group on 45/100.
Where each one leads
Hughes Communications
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 50/100
PARATUS group
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Hughes Communications | PARATUS group |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hughes Communications was a provider of satellite-based communication services, now a subsidiary of EchoStar. | Pan-African telecommunications provider delivering integrated network services and digital infrastructure across Africa. |
| Category | Satellite Communications, Telecommunications, Internet Service Provider, Managed Network Services | Telecom Infrastructure, Connectivity, Fiber Optics, Satellite Communications |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | Services |
| Founded | 1971 | 2003 |
| Headquarters | Germantown, United States | Johannesburg, South Africa |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hughes Communications | PARATUS group |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,225 | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $31.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Debt |
| LinkedIn followers | 69,200 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hughes Communications | PARATUS group |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | Not published | 45/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 37/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 14/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hughes Communications | PARATUS group |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel |
Hughes Communications vs PARATUS group: common questions
Which is better, Hughes Communications or PARATUS group?
On our 0-100 score PARATUS group rates higher (45/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hughes Communications and PARATUS group compare on the numbers?
Hughes Communications leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 35/100), domain rating (72/100 against 50/100).
Read the full Hughes Communications review and pricing or the PARATUS group review and pricing. You can also browse other Hughes Communications alternatives we track.