Hudl vs Track160
Hudl vs Track160, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hudl is on 62/100 and Track160 on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Hudl
- our overall score: 62/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 27/100
- funding raised: $223M against $5.0M
Track160
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Hudl | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hudl provides video analysis and coaching tools for sports teams to improve performance and strategy. | Automated FIFA EPTS certified football data analytics platform for clubs and leagues. |
| Category | Sports Tech, Video Analysis, Performance Analytics, Coaching Tools | Sports, Analytics, Video, Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2006 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Lincoln, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hudl | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -29.6% |
| Total funding | $223M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 3,875 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hudl | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 18/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hudl | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Hudl vs Track160: common questions
Which is better, Hudl or Track160?
On our 0-100 score Hudl rates higher (62/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hudl and Track160 compare on the numbers?
Hudl leads on our overall score (62/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 21/100), domain rating (83/100 against 27/100), funding raised ($223M against $5.0M).
Read the full Hudl review and pricing or the Track160 review and pricing. You can also browse other Hudl alternatives we track.