Hubert vs Lever
Hubert vs Lever, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hubert is on 37/100 and Lever on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Hubert
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 53/100
Lever
- our overall score: 64/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 201 against 45
- funding raised: $82.8M against $3.9M
- LinkedIn following: 52,512 against 3,339
At a glance
| Measure | Hubert | Lever |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hubert.ai develops an AI-powered interview platform that automates initial candidate screening and provides data-driven insights. | Talent acquisition software suite combining ATS and CRM to streamline hiring. |
| Category | HR Tech, Recruitment Tech, Talent Acquisition, AI Interviewing | HR Tech, Talent Acquisition, Applicant Tracking System, Candidate Relationship Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hubert | Lever |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 45 | 201 |
| Total funding | $3.9M | $82.8M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,339 | 52,512 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hubert | Lever |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 37/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 43/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hubert | Lever |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, PostHog, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Hubert vs Lever: common questions
Which is better, Hubert or Lever?
On our 0-100 score Lever rates higher (64/100 against 37/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hubert and Lever compare on the numbers?
Hubert leads on agent readiness (59/100 against 53/100). Lever leads on our overall score (64/100 against 37/100), domain rating (91/100 against 51/100), headcount (201 against 45), funding raised ($82.8M against $3.9M), LinkedIn following (52,512 against 3,339).
Read the full Hubert review and pricing or the Lever review and pricing. You can also browse other Hubert alternatives we track.