Househound vs Qbiq
Househound vs Qbiq, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Househound is on 6/100 and Qbiq on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Househound
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Qbiq
- our overall score: 59/100 against 6/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 49/100 against 0/100
At a glance
| Measure | Househound | Qbiq |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-powered analysis agent for short-term rental investors, providing data-driven insights for investment decisions. | Qbiq accelerates real estate space planning from weeks to minutes using AI to generate 3D tours and architectural layouts. |
| Category | Proptech, Fintech, Agentic AI, AI Agent | Proptech, Architecture, 3D, Augmented Reality (AR) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Househound | Qbiq |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 104 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +38.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $26.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 16,423 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Househound | Qbiq |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 6/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 57/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Househound | Qbiq |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel |
Househound vs Qbiq: common questions
Which is better, Househound or Qbiq?
On our 0-100 score Qbiq rates higher (59/100 against 6/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Househound and Qbiq compare on the numbers?
Qbiq leads on our overall score (59/100 against 6/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 29/100), domain rating (49/100 against 0/100).
Read the full Househound review and pricing or the Qbiq review and pricing. You can also browse other Househound alternatives we track.