Hopper Security vs Team Cymru
Hopper Security vs Team Cymru, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hopper Security is on 47/100 and Team Cymru on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Hopper Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Team Cymru
- our overall score: 57/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 129 against 17
- funding raised: $63.0M against $7.6M
- LinkedIn following: 16,012 against 1,751
At a glance
| Measure | Hopper Security | Team Cymru |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Proactive cybersecurity platform that predicts and prevents threats before they happen. | Real-time threat intelligence platform. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, Threat Detection, Threat Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 1998 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Orem, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hopper Security | Team Cymru |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 129 |
| Total funding | $7.6M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,751 | 16,012 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hopper Security | Team Cymru |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 42/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 21/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hopper Security | Team Cymru |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Hopper Security vs Team Cymru: common questions
Which is better, Hopper Security or Team Cymru?
On our 0-100 score Team Cymru rates higher (57/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hopper Security and Team Cymru compare on the numbers?
Team Cymru leads on our overall score (57/100 against 47/100), domain rating (74/100 against 21/100), headcount (129 against 17), funding raised ($63.0M against $7.6M), LinkedIn following (16,012 against 1,751).
Read the full Hopper Security review and pricing or the Team Cymru review and pricing. You can also browse other Hopper Security alternatives we track.