HoneyHive vs RunSybil
HoneyHive vs RunSybil, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: HoneyHive is on 46/100 and RunSybil on 55/100.
Where each one leads
HoneyHive
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 32/100
RunSybil
- our overall score: 55/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 28 against 19
- funding raised: $40.0M against $10.0M
At a glance
| Measure | HoneyHive | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | HoneyHive helps enterprises trace, evaluate, monitor, and improve production AI agents across teams, stacks, and sensitive data environments. | RunSybil offers an AI-driven pentester that automates hacker intuition to find vulnerabilities, aiming to drive down the speed and cost of vulnerability discovery to zero. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Vulnerability Management, AI-driven Security | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Penetration Testing, AI-driven Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | HoneyHive | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 28 |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Unknown |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,678 | 2,720 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | HoneyHive | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | HoneyHive | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, PostHog | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | HoneyHive | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI-driven pentesting, Rapid onboarding, Attack replay, Test transparency, Integrations |
What users say
| Measure | HoneyHive | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 3 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“RunSybil. discussion of the automated offensive security testing platform RunSybil (www.runsybil.com)”r/
HoneyHive vs RunSybil: common questions
Which is better, HoneyHive or RunSybil?
On our 0-100 score RunSybil rates higher (55/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do HoneyHive and RunSybil compare on the numbers?
HoneyHive leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 45/100), domain rating (58/100 against 32/100). RunSybil leads on our overall score (55/100 against 46/100), headcount (28 against 19), funding raised ($40.0M against $10.0M).
What do real users say about HoneyHive and RunSybil?
RunSybil: 3 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full HoneyHive review and pricing or the RunSybil review and pricing. You can also browse other HoneyHive alternatives we track.

