Hobbywing vs Quickbase
Hobbywing vs Quickbase, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hobbywing is on 6/100 and Quickbase on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Hobbywing
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Quickbase
- our overall score: 69/100 against 6/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 37/100
At a glance
| Measure | Hobbywing | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hobbywing provides AI-powered tools for operational record management, scope boundary definition, and repeatable checks. | Low-code application platform for work management, centralizing complex projects and processes. |
| Category | Operational Intelligence, Workflow Automation, Process Automation, Business Process Management | Work Management, Low-Code Development, Application Platform, Business Process Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Waltham, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hobbywing | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 814 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -24.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.0B |
| Latest round | Not published | Acquisition |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 27,996 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hobbywing | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 6/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hobbywing | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Hobbywing vs Quickbase: common questions
Which is better, Hobbywing or Quickbase?
On our 0-100 score Quickbase rates higher (69/100 against 6/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hobbywing and Quickbase compare on the numbers?
Quickbase leads on our overall score (69/100 against 6/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 37/100).
Read the full Hobbywing review and pricing or the Quickbase review and pricing. You can also browse other Hobbywing alternatives we track.