Hive Robotics vs Uma
Hive Robotics vs Uma, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hive Robotics is on 55/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Hive Robotics
- headcount: 41 against 29
Uma
- our overall score: 58/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 26/100
- domain rating: 36/100 against 11/100
- funding raised: $40.0M against $5.7M
- LinkedIn following: 5,831 against 368
At a glance
| Measure | Hive Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Robotics company developing autonomous systems for complex environments. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, Humanoid Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Autonomous Systems | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hive Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 41 | 29 |
| Total funding | $5.7M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 368 | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hive Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 34/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 5/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 11/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hive Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Hive Robotics vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, Hive Robotics or Uma?
On our 0-100 score Uma rates higher (58/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hive Robotics and Uma compare on the numbers?
Hive Robotics leads on headcount (41 against 29). Uma leads on our overall score (58/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 26/100), domain rating (36/100 against 11/100), funding raised ($40.0M against $5.7M), LinkedIn following (5,831 against 368).
Read the full Hive Robotics review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other Hive Robotics alternatives we track.