Hirect vs Landing.Jobs
Hirect vs Landing.Jobs, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hirect is on 50/100 and Landing.Jobs on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Hirect
- funding raised: $15.6M against $2.9M
Landing.Jobs
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 24/100
At a glance
| Measure | Hirect | Landing.Jobs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered chat-based hiring platform connecting job seekers directly with hiring managers. | A tech recruitment platform connecting talent with companies. |
| Category | HR Tech, Recruitment, Talent Acquisition, Job Search | HR Tech, Recruitment, Talent Acquisition, Job Board |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Gurugram, India | Lisbon, Portugal |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hirect | Landing.Jobs |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $15.6M | $2.9M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hirect | Landing.Jobs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 36/100 | 32/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 16/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 24/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hirect | Landing.Jobs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Hirect vs Landing.Jobs: common questions
Which is better, Hirect or Landing.Jobs?
On our 0-100 score Hirect rates higher (50/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hirect and Landing.Jobs compare on the numbers?
Hirect leads on funding raised ($15.6M against $2.9M). Landing.Jobs leads on agent readiness (44/100 against 21/100), domain rating (59/100 against 24/100).
Read the full Hirect review and pricing or the Landing.Jobs review and pricing. You can also browse other Hirect alternatives we track.