HQ vs Via
HQ vs Via, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: HQ is on 57/100 and Via on 73/100.
Where each one leads
HQ
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 38/100
- headcount growth: +29.6% against +17.6%
Via
- our overall score: 73/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 2,057 against 174
- funding raised: $887M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 200,528 against 7,485
At a glance
| Measure | HQ | Via |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise solution for corporate ground transportation booking, billing, and payment. | Via is a transit technology company that partners with cities and transit agencies to deploy on-demand and fixed-route public transportation services. |
| Category | Mobility, Ride Service, Route Optimization, Travel Tech | Mobility, Ride Service, App, Ridesharing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Not published | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | HQ | Via |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 174 | 2,057 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.6% | +17.6% |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $887M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Series H |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,485 | 200,528 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | HQ | Via |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | HQ | Via |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
HQ vs Via: common questions
Which is better, HQ or Via?
On our 0-100 score Via rates higher (73/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do HQ and Via compare on the numbers?
HQ leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 38/100), headcount growth (+29.6% against +17.6%). Via leads on our overall score (73/100 against 57/100), domain rating (75/100 against 29/100), headcount (2,057 against 174), funding raised ($887M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (200,528 against 7,485).
Read the full HQ review and pricing or the Via review and pricing. You can also browse other HQ alternatives we track.