Hexagon vs Schrödinger
Hexagon vs Schrödinger, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hexagon is on 62/100 and Schrödinger on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Hexagon
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Schrödinger
- our overall score: 69/100 against 62/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 1,003 against 67
- funding raised: $220M against $61.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Hexagon | Schrödinger |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Biotech company using genomics and AI to discover novel small-molecule medicines from microbial genomes. | Physics-based software platform for molecular discovery and design in life and materials sciences. |
| Category | AI, Biotech, Drug Discovery | Drug Discovery, Biotech, Pharmaceuticals, Materials Science |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | services | platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 1990 |
| Headquarters | Menlo Park, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hexagon | Schrödinger |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 67 | 1,003 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -8.1% |
| Total funding | $61.0M | $220M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 65,181 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hexagon | Schrödinger |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 5/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hexagon | Schrödinger |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Jetpack Stats |
Hexagon vs Schrödinger: common questions
Which is better, Hexagon or Schrödinger?
On our 0-100 score Schrödinger rates higher (69/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hexagon and Schrödinger compare on the numbers?
Schrödinger leads on our overall score (69/100 against 62/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 39/100), domain rating (72/100 against 28/100), headcount (1,003 against 67), funding raised ($220M against $61.0M).
Read the full Hexagon review and pricing or the Schrödinger review and pricing. You can also browse other Hexagon alternatives we track.