Heed vs Track160
Heed vs Track160, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Heed is on 51/100 and Track160 on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Heed
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 21/100
- headcount growth: +4.8% against -29.6%
- funding raised: $35.0M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 5,303 against 3,875
Track160
- headcount: 34 against 11
At a glance
| Measure | Heed | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Consumer platform transforming sports and entertainment with IoT analytics and AI for real-time insights. | Automated FIFA EPTS certified football data analytics platform for clubs and leagues. |
| Category | Sports, Sports Tech, Entertainment Tech, IoT | Sports, Analytics, Video, Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Heed | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 11 | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.8% | -29.6% |
| Total funding | $35.0M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,303 | 3,875 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Heed | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Heed | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
Heed vs Track160: common questions
Which is better, Heed or Track160?
On our 0-100 score Track160 rates higher (52/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Heed and Track160 compare on the numbers?
Heed leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 21/100), headcount growth (+4.8% against -29.6%), funding raised ($35.0M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (5,303 against 3,875). Track160 leads on headcount (34 against 11).
Read the full Heed review and pricing or the Track160 review and pricing. You can also browse other Heed alternatives we track.