Hearst vs Thomson Reuters
Hearst vs Thomson Reuters, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hearst is on 25/100 and Thomson Reuters on 41/100.
Where each one leads
Hearst
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Thomson Reuters
- our overall score: 41/100 against 25/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 24/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 78/100
- headcount: 36,619 against 6,117
- LinkedIn following: 1,917,927 against 182,087
At a glance
| Measure | Hearst | Thomson Reuters |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Multinational conglomerate with diverse media, financial services, and software interests. | Global provider of business information, news, and technology for legal, tax, audit, and accounting professionals. |
| Category | Media, Publishing, Television, Financial Services | LegalTech, TaxTech, AuditTech, AccountingTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | platform | services |
| Founded | 1887 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Toronto, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hearst | Thomson Reuters |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6,117 | 36,619 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +62.1% | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 182,087 | 1,917,927 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hearst | Thomson Reuters |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 25/100 | 41/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 44/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (24/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hearst | Thomson Reuters |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Hearst | Thomson Reuters |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Ed Sheeran for the January/February 2026 issue of Men’s Health US/UK; Photography by Patrik Giardino/Hearst Owned.”r/popculturechat
Hearst vs Thomson Reuters: common questions
Which is better, Hearst or Thomson Reuters?
On our 0-100 score Thomson Reuters rates higher (41/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hearst and Thomson Reuters compare on the numbers?
Thomson Reuters leads on our overall score (41/100 against 25/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 24/100), domain rating (90/100 against 78/100), headcount (36,619 against 6,117), LinkedIn following (1,917,927 against 182,087).
What do real users say about Hearst and Thomson Reuters?
Hearst: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/popculturechat.
Read the full Hearst review and pricing or the Thomson Reuters review and pricing. You can also browse other Hearst alternatives we track.