Head Digital Works vs Wildlife Studios
Head Digital Works vs Wildlife Studios, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Head Digital Works is on 61/100 and Wildlife Studios on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Head Digital Works
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Wildlife Studios
- our overall score: 68/100 against 61/100
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 18/100
- headcount: 458 against 350
- headcount growth: -12.4% against -37.4%
- funding raised: $450M against $81.9M
- LinkedIn following: 144,176 against 88,799
At a glance
| Measure | Head Digital Works | Wildlife Studios |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | India's leading online skill-based gaming company operating A23, A23Rummy, and Cricket.com. | Global mobile game developer and publisher creating engaging free-to-play games for billions of players. |
| Category | Gaming, Online Gaming, Skill-Based Gaming, Rummy | Gaming, Mobile Games, Game Development, Game Publishing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2005 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Mumbai, India | São Paulo, Brazil |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Head Digital Works | Wildlife Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 350 | 458 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -37.4% | -12.4% |
| Total funding | $81.9M | $450M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 88,799 | 144,176 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Head Digital Works | Wildlife Studios |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 84/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 89/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 18/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Head Digital Works | Wildlife Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar |
Head Digital Works vs Wildlife Studios: common questions
Which is better, Head Digital Works or Wildlife Studios?
On our 0-100 score Wildlife Studios rates higher (68/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Head Digital Works and Wildlife Studios compare on the numbers?
Wildlife Studios leads on our overall score (68/100 against 61/100), agent readiness (37/100 against 25/100), domain rating (61/100 against 18/100), headcount (458 against 350), headcount growth (-12.4% against -37.4%), funding raised ($450M against $81.9M), LinkedIn following (144,176 against 88,799).
Read the full Head Digital Works review and pricing or the Wildlife Studios review and pricing. You can also browse other Head Digital Works alternatives we track.