Harness vs OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications
Harness vs OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Harness is on 67/100 and OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications on 22/100.
Where each one leads
Harness
- our overall score: 67/100 against 22/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 21/100
OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications
- headcount: 2,231 against 1,625
At a glance
| Measure | Harness | OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The Modern Software Delivery Platform. | An AI-powered low-code platform for building enterprise applications and agents. |
| Category | DevOps, Software Delivery, Cloud Native, Application Security | Low-Code Development, Enterprise Software, AI Development Platform, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Harness | OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,625 | 2,231 |
| Total funding | $815M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| Valuation | $5.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 185,312 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Harness | OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 22/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Harness | OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Harness vs OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications: common questions
Which is better, Harness or OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications?
On our 0-100 score Harness rates higher (67/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Harness and OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications compare on the numbers?
Harness leads on our overall score (67/100 against 22/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 21/100). OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications leads on headcount (2,231 against 1,625).
Read the full Harness review and pricing or the OutSystems Platform - Enterprise Low-Code Delivery for Modern Applications review and pricing. You can also browse other Harness alternatives we track.