Hark vs Physical Intelligence
Hark vs Physical Intelligence, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Hark is on 30/100 and Physical Intelligence on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Hark
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Physical Intelligence
- our overall score: 65/100 against 30/100
- agent readiness: 36/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 56/100
- funding raised: $1.6B against $700M
At a glance
| Measure | Hark | Physical Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Personalized AI with hardware, software, and intuitive interfaces for human-machine interaction | General intelligence for robots, a brain that can power any robot for any application using multimodal learning. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Personal AI, Hardware, Foundation Models | Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Foundation Models, Embodied AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | Not published | B2B SaaS / API |
| Offering | Not published | Platform |
| Founded | 2025 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Hark | Physical Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 213 |
| Total funding | $700M | $1.6B |
| Latest round | Series A | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $6.0B | $11B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 23,322 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Hark | Physical Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 30/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 58/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Hark | Physical Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Hark vs Physical Intelligence: common questions
Which is better, Hark or Physical Intelligence?
On our 0-100 score Physical Intelligence rates higher (65/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Hark and Physical Intelligence compare on the numbers?
Physical Intelligence leads on our overall score (65/100 against 30/100), agent readiness (36/100 against 31/100), domain rating (70/100 against 56/100), funding raised ($1.6B against $700M).
Read the full Hark review and pricing or the Physical Intelligence review and pricing. You can also browse other Hark alternatives we track.