Haiqu vs QBLOX
Haiqu vs QBLOX, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Haiqu is on 53/100 and QBLOX on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Haiqu
- domain rating: 55/100 against 49/100
QBLOX
- our overall score: 61/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 183 against 22
- funding raised: $26.0M against $16.6M
- LinkedIn following: 15,366 against 4,680
At a glance
| Measure | Haiqu | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing quantum software to make quantum computing practical and cost-effective for near-term applications. | Qblox provides modular hardware and software solutions for scalable quantum computer control. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Fluid Dynamics, AI Hardware & Chips | Quantum Computing, Quantum Hardware, Quantum Control Systems, Quantum Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Hardware |
| Founded | 2022 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York City, United States | Delft, Netherlands |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Haiqu | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22 | 183 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +9.7% |
| Total funding | $16.6M | $26.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,680 | 15,366 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Haiqu | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | 24/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 75/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Haiqu | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Haiqu vs QBLOX: common questions
Which is better, Haiqu or QBLOX?
On our 0-100 score QBLOX rates higher (61/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Haiqu and QBLOX compare on the numbers?
Haiqu leads on domain rating (55/100 against 49/100). QBLOX leads on our overall score (61/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 26/100), headcount (183 against 22), funding raised ($26.0M against $16.6M), LinkedIn following (15,366 against 4,680).
Read the full Haiqu review and pricing or the QBLOX review and pricing. You can also browse other Haiqu alternatives we track.