Guardz vs Imperva
Guardz vs Imperva, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Guardz is on 57/100 and Imperva on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Guardz
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Imperva
- our overall score: 67/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 65/100
- headcount: 1,700 against 160
- funding raised: $75.7M against $21.5M
- LinkedIn following: 75,709 against 9,309
At a glance
| Measure | Guardz | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered cybersecurity and insurance for MSPs to protect clients from evolving threats. | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, InsurTech, Managed Service Provider (MSP) | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Guardz | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 160 | 1,700 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +78.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $21.5M | $75.7M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $10.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,309 | 75,709 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Guardz | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 57/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Guardz | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Guardz vs Imperva: common questions
Which is better, Guardz or Imperva?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Guardz and Imperva compare on the numbers?
Imperva leads on our overall score (67/100 against 57/100), domain rating (84/100 against 65/100), headcount (1,700 against 160), funding raised ($75.7M against $21.5M), LinkedIn following (75,709 against 9,309).
Read the full Guardz review and pricing or the Imperva review and pricing. You can also browse other Guardz alternatives we track.