GuardKnox vs Upstream Security
GuardKnox vs Upstream Security, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GuardKnox is on 54/100 and Upstream Security on 61/100.
Where each one leads
GuardKnox
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Upstream Security
- our overall score: 61/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 164 against 12
- funding raised: $104M against $24.0M
At a glance
| Measure | GuardKnox | Upstream Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automotive cybersecurity and connectivity solutions for next-generation vehicles. | Automotive cybersecurity and data management platform for connected vehicles. |
| Category | Automotive, Cybersecurity, Software Defined (SD), Automotive Cybersecurity | Automotive, Cybersecurity, Connected Vehicle, Automotive Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GuardKnox | Upstream Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 12 | 164 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +11.7% |
| Total funding | $24.0M | $104M |
| Latest round | Series A | Pre-Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 15,111 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GuardKnox | Upstream Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 12/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GuardKnox | Upstream Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
GuardKnox vs Upstream Security: common questions
Which is better, GuardKnox or Upstream Security?
On our 0-100 score Upstream Security rates higher (61/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GuardKnox and Upstream Security compare on the numbers?
Upstream Security leads on our overall score (61/100 against 54/100), domain rating (66/100 against 56/100), headcount (164 against 12), funding raised ($104M against $24.0M).
Read the full GuardKnox review and pricing or the Upstream Security review and pricing. You can also browse other GuardKnox alternatives we track.