Guardium vs Imperva
Guardium vs Imperva, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Guardium is on 34/100 and Imperva on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Guardium
- headcount: 336,401 against 1,700
- LinkedIn following: 19,634,656 against 75,709
Imperva
- our overall score: 67/100 against 34/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 31/100
- funding raised: $75.7M against $35.8M
At a glance
| Measure | Guardium | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Comprehensive data security platform for real-time monitoring, vulnerability assessment, and compliance reporting. | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. |
| Category | Enterprise, Security, Cybersecurity, Data Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2001 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, United States | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Guardium | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 336,401 | 1,700 |
| Total funding | $35.8M | $75.7M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $10.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 19,634,656 | 75,709 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Guardium | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 34/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | Not published | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 57/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Guardium | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
Guardium vs Imperva: common questions
Which is better, Guardium or Imperva?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Guardium and Imperva compare on the numbers?
Guardium leads on headcount (336,401 against 1,700), LinkedIn following (19,634,656 against 75,709). Imperva leads on our overall score (67/100 against 34/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 31/100), funding raised ($75.7M against $35.8M).
Read the full Guardium review and pricing or the Imperva review and pricing. You can also browse other Guardium alternatives we track.